// Workshops · Embedded support · The playbook
Your engineers already have the tools. What's missing is the operating system around them: the workflows, the review discipline, the habits. We train teams, work alongside them on real tickets, and leave behind a playbook they own.
$ git diff -- how_we_work.md- feature: two weeks, three engineers+ feature: two days, one engineer + agents- prompt first, think later+ spec first, then delegate- review: "LGTM 👍"+ review: verified behavior, not vibes- AI policy: "please be careful"+ AI policy: written, versioned, yours
Most teams bought the tools, watched a demo, and changed nothing about how they actually work. The result: autocomplete-grade gains from agent-grade technology.
AI-first is a way of working — how you spec, delegate, verify, and review. That's a team skill, and team skills are trained, not installed.
We're engineers, not slideware consultants. Every engagement happens in your codebase, on your tickets, with your team at the keyboard.
Live and hands-on. Your team leaves with working agentic workflows — not notes about them.
We join your team and make it stick — pairing on real tickets until the new default holds.
The written system your team keeps: workflows, prompts, checklists and policy — adapted to you.
No capacity in the team right now? Our sister offering builds your product with you — from idea to shipped software.
AI Product Builder →The workflows are tool-agnostic — spec-driven delegation, context engineering and verification apply whether your team runs Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Cursor or an in-house setup. We tailor the exercises to whatever your team actually uses.
For workshops, a representative slice is enough — many clients use a sanitized mirror. For hands-on support we work inside your environment under your access controls, and we'll sign whatever your security team needs.
Yes. The playbook stands on its own and is the cheapest way to start. Most teams that begin there come back for a workshop once they see how much of the value sits in practice, not reading.
We agree on observable outcomes up front — cycle time on typical tickets, review turnaround, how much of the team uses the new workflows unprompted — and measure them before and after instead of asking for feelings on a survey.
Fill in the form and we'll reply within one business day with an honest read: whether a workshop, embedded support or just the playbook is the right first move. If we're not the right fit, we'll say that too.
Prefer email? info@swipergy.com